Sorry, thrift encoding should be string encoding. On Monday, October 13, 2014, Peter Neumark <peter.neum...@prezi.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Looking at the wire format's type IDs, it's clear that thrift supports > several thrift encodings in it's wire format, yet the IDL does not allow > one to speak of string encoding (string/binary are the only type names in > the IDL). > > Is this a design decision (where each language implementation can choose > the appropriate Unicode type id for encoding strings), or is there some > historical reason for not exposing string encoding options in the thrift > IDL? > > Thanks, > Peter > > -- > > *Peter Neumark* > DevOps guy @Prezi <http://prezi.com> > -- *Peter Neumark* DevOps guy @Prezi <http://prezi.com>
