Hi Peter,

They need to be interoperable between all platforms an lggs. Somewhere in the 
docs UTF8 is mentioned, IIRC. Is that what you ask for?

________________________________
Von: Peter Neumark
Gesendet: 13.10.2014 22:59
An: dev@thrift.apache.org
Betreff: unicode types

Hi all,

Looking at the wire format's type IDs, it's clear that thrift supports
several thrift encodings in it's wire format, yet the IDL does not allow
one to speak of string encoding (string/binary are the only type names in
the IDL).

Is this a design decision (where each language implementation can choose
the appropriate Unicode type id for encoding strings), or is there some
historical reason for not exposing string encoding options in the thrift
IDL?

Thanks,
Peter

--

*Peter Neumark*
DevOps guy @Prezi <http://prezi.com>

Reply via email to