+1

On 14 May 2015 at 02:51, Nobuaki Sukegawa <nsu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> I really liked the flexibility and the degree of Windows support when
> dealing with both tools for patches.
> Only downside for me has been having two systems.
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Ben Craig <bencr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +0
> >
> > I don't have strong opinions on autoconf vs. cmake.  +1 for getting rid
> of
> > one of the build systems though.  Many thanks for those that took the
> > effort to develop and try out the new build system.
> >
> > Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org> wrote on 05/12/2015 11:21:41 PM:
> >
> > > From: Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org>
> > > To: "dev@thrift.apache.org" <dev@thrift.apache.org>,
> > > Date: 05/12/2015 11:21 PM
> > > Subject: [VOTE] Switch Apache Thrift from autoconf to cmake
> > >
> > > Based on a previous positive discussion regarding switching our build
> > > system over from autoconf to cmake [1] and the recent progress that has
> > > been made with cmake in trunk I would like to propose the following
> > >
> > > 1. we cut Apache Thrift 0.9.3 using the current layout with autoconf
> > > 2. remove autoconf completely from trunk and replace any missing
> library
> > > builds with cmake
> > > 3. cut Apache Thrift 1.0 with cmake
> > >
> > > I am concerned that not selecting one build system over the other and
> > > trying to maintain both will start to impact quality in the long run
> and
> > > want to make sure that we maintain the the best possible experience for
> > our
> > > community and developers.
> > >
> > > Since this is a major change in how the project is built I want to
> > > encourage all community members to cast a vote as this will impact how
> > > everyone uses Apache Thrift on a regular basis
> > >
> > > The vote will close on Sun May 17 00:00:00 EDT 2015
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Switch Apache Thrift from autoconf to cmake
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not switch Apache Thrift from autoconf to cmake because...
> > >
> > > I would like to get the voting started with my own +1
> > >
> > > -Jake
> > >
> > > [1]: http://s.apache.org/1HC
> >
>

Reply via email to