[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14613651#comment-14613651
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-3220:
----------------------------------------

GitHub user notona opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/540

    dont' create @Generated annotation when using with java:android option

    Generated Java RPC Client Code is using @Generated Annotation. 
    But Android does not support @Generated Annotation.
    so i think, thrift dont' have to create @Generated Annotation when using 
thrift command with java:android option
    
    here is the issue.
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3220

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/notona/thrift generated_annotation_fix

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/540.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #540
    
----
commit 2713ce852d29e00c1dcfe49ca7979925e37dbd9a
Author: notona <not...@gmail.com>
Date:   2015-07-04T09:50:19Z

    dont' create @Generated annotation when using with java:android option

----


> Android does not support @Generated Annotation
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-3220
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3220
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Compiler (General)
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.2
>            Reporter: notona
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Generated Java RPC Client Code is using @Generated Annotation. 
> But Android does not support @Generated Annotation.
> so i think, thrift dont' have to create  @Generated Annotation when using 
> thrift command with java:android option.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to