Hello Jake, I see some decision to support both versions - static and dynamic in one build. Then we struggle with strange macroses like LINK_AGAINST... and make build scripts more and more complicated. Perhaps, the better way use BUILD_SHARED_LIBS option instead.
Who have clean vision about naming convention for libraries, install rules, etc? I would love to help, but currently I'm not sure what should be done exactly. 2015-09-02 16:43 GMT+03:00 Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org>: > Hi Sergei > The goal for that ticket is for our 1.0 release to be able to replace all > existing functionality currently with the build framework with cmake > counter parts. I took an initial stab at it and Roger was also working on > this, but both efforts have been put on hold while working on the 0.9.3 > release. Any help is greatly appreciated > > -Jake > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Sergei Nikulov <sergey.niku...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello developers. >> >> Could you please provide me with some hint what current state of >> cmakeable build for Apache Thrift? >> Do we have any requirements and goals to achieve? >> >> What is definition of done for >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2850? >> >> Thank you! >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Sergei Nikulov >> -- Best Regards, Sergei Nikulov
