[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15090710#comment-15090710
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-3510:
----------------------------------------

Github user Jens-G commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/762#issuecomment-170263676
  
    If we can avoid another flag (we already have too many of them) and if it 
does not break compatibility, I'm for it.


> Add HttpTaskAsyncHandler implementation
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-3510
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3510
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: C# - Compiler, C# - Library
>            Reporter: Adam Connelly
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The THttpHandler doesn't support an async pipeline. This means that it's 
> difficult for service implementations to make async calls. If there was an 
> implementation of HttpTaskAsyncHandler, you could write services using async 
> calls.
> Additionally, if you generate the C# classes with the current async support, 
> you get a single interface with both sync and async methods. This doesn't 
> really make sense on the server side since if you implement a service you end 
> up leaving all the async method unimplemented. It would be useful if there 
> were separate sync and async interfaces to make this a bit tidier.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to