[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15244995#comment-15244995
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-3768:
----------------------------------------
Github user tpcwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/980#discussion_r59996087
--- Diff: lib/cpp/src/thrift/server/TThreadedServer.cpp ---
@@ -90,31 +95,71 @@ TThreadedServer::~TThreadedServer() {
}
void TThreadedServer::serve() {
+ threadFactory_->setDetached(false);
--- End diff --
I am *slightly* concerned about user reusing the thrift factory in other
part of the code, so changing this can change the function of their other code.
I'm not too sure what the maintainers usually do when there are some minor
functional changes.
> TThreadedServer may crash if it is destroyed immediately after it returns
> from serve(); TThreadedServer disconnects clients when they connec
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-3768
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3768
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: C++ - Library
> Affects Versions: 0.9.3
> Reporter: Ted Wang
> Assignee: James E. King, III
> Priority: Minor
>
> Here's a sequence that shows the race:
> Thread-1 (Users of TThreadedServer): Calls TThreadedServer::stop(), which
> calls interruptChildren and initiates the tearing down of client connections.
> Thread-2: In TServerFramework::serve(), broke out of accept, and now blocks
> in TThreadedServer::serve() waiting to drain all the clients.
> Thread-3 (The connected client thread created by TThreadedServer): In
> disposeConnectedClient, running because the server is shutting down and the
> shared_ptr specified this function to be the cleanup function for the client.
> This thread just returned from onClientDisconnected and now context switches.
> Thread-2: TThreadedServer::serve() is notified that all of the clients have
> disconnected and completes.
> Thread-1: Joins on Thread-2 and destroys the server object because it is done.
> Thread-3: Finally gets a chance to run, but now encounters undefined behavior
> because it is still executing a member function of an object that has been
> destroyed.
> You can force this race in action if you put sleep(1) before
> onClientDisconnected() in disposeConnectedClient
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
