[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15268004#comment-15268004
 ] 

Hudson commented on THRIFT-3794:
--------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Thrift-precommit #451 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Thrift-precommit/451/])
THRIFT-3794 Fixing exception types in library now that they have been (jensg: 
[https://github.com/apache/thrift/commit/e363a34e63e851f17061a912a77e75a8ed8474bc])
* lib/delphi/src/Thrift.Transport.pas
* lib/delphi/src/Thrift.Socket.pas


> Split Delphi application, protocol and transport exception subtypes into 
> separate exceptions
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-3794
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3794
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Delphi - Library
>            Reporter: Kyle Johnson
>            Assignee: Kyle Johnson
>             Fix For: 0.10.0
>
>         Attachments: 
> THRIFT-3794-Split-Application-Protocol-Transport-exception-subtypes.patch, 
> THRIFT-3794-Split-Delphi-application-protocol-and-tr.patch
>
>
> It is much more convenient to work with a hierarchy of exceptions for several 
> reasons, including, but not limited to the following:
> 1) Writing exception handler filters is much simpler and clearer when one can 
> simply say "on E: TTransportExceptionTimedOut do" instead of "on E: 
> TTransportException do if E.Type_ = 
> TTransportException.TExceptionType.TimedOut then".
> 2) Ignoring exception types within the Delphi IDE is doable, but not by 
> exception subtype, as with the Delphi library.  It isn't possible to ignore 
> transport timeouts and not ignore all other transport exception subtypes.  
> This makes debugging much more challenging when stepping through code.
> I propose splitting the TApplicationException, TProtocolException and 
> TTransportException classes into separate exception classes based on 
> exception subtype.  It should be possible to do so while retaining backward 
> compatibility for code that relies on the old exception methodology.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to