Hi, I'm helping co-maintain the thrift packages in Fedora (taking over a bit from a less active maintainer), and I'm wondering if any of the thrift developers familiar with the thrift build system could give us a sanity check on our RPM thrift.spec file. In particular, the %prep (where tarball is unpacked and patches are applied), %build (where configure/make are called to build the project), and %install (where `make install` is called) sections.
Fedora's packaging specification can be found here: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/thrift.git/tree/ Downstream packaging is important, because it helps your software reach new users, and helps your existing users easily get started using your project, so I hope somebody will be interested in helping out a bit. And, unlike commercial vendor packaging (not that there's anything wrong with that), downstream open source packaging communities like Fedora (and Debian, Homebrew, etc.) promote open source models of development and community-building and can reach a new audience of potential contributors to the upstream projects. We've had to do a lot of patching of the build to get thrift to build at all in Fedora, and I'm wondering if maybe there's some things we can do to simplify our builds a bit. I'm also hoping that what we're doing downstream can help inform where you should make improvements upstream to your build system. For example, Fedora will probably always need to patch ant to use local (RPM-provided) dependencies, but perhaps the patch could be simplified if Thrift realized this was needed by some downstream packagers? As you may have seen, I've been opening some JIRA issues already with the build system: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4118 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4119 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4120 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4122 I'm willing to continue reporting issues as I find them, but I may have reached my limit on my ability to understand Thrift's build system (I'm not that familiar with C/C++ build tooling, and autotools seems daunting to me). As is, thrift's packaging in Fedora is far more complicated than most. I'm hoping that can be changed with some assistance from the upstream developers. Simplification can ensure that thrift will be continued to be packaged and available to Fedora users for a long time. Feel free to get involved in the Fedora project (it's also open source) or contact me directly if you have any questions, or thoughts, or wish to offer your assistance in any way. I can be reached at ctubb...@apache.org or ctubb...@fedoraproject.org (in addition to following this thread). Thank you for your time, Christopher
