Github user zhiyu-he commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1440 @jeking3 but the difference between buffer-transport and frame_transportï¼ is only the data-length. i think thrift transport only use for raw-socket read&write. within golang, it's inefficient and cost more cpu time. in binary_protocol, e.g for int64, int64->temp-buf(binary_protol)->buf(transport-buf)->socket this is not go enough for efficiency so i want optimize this partã
---