[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321447#comment-16321447
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-4448:
----------------------------------------

Github user jeking3 commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1459
  
    At this point we should consider dropping go 1.6.  Other go projects have 
moved on and we can too.  I had a discussion with someone about whether it 
makes sense to support older go versions, and they said back to 1.7 makes 
sense, but 1.6 to 1.7 was a breaking change.  Separately, we might dump the 
trusty CI build environment.  Not sure about that yet.


> Golang: do something with context.Context
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-4448
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4448
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Go - Library
>    Affects Versions: 0.11.0
>            Reporter: John Boiles
>
> PR Here: https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1459
> This patch wires through {{context.Context}} such that it can be used in in 
> {{http.Request}}'s {{WithContext}} method. This allows Thrift HTTP requests 
> to canceled or timed out via the context.
> This patch breaks support for go<1.7 so it's not ready to ship, but I'm 
> hoping to get some direction on this. When does Thrift expect to drop support 
> of go1.7? It looks like the current solution is to duplicate files that need 
> to use {{golang.org/x/net/context}} and add a {{// +build !go1.7}} but 
> duplication seems unsustainable as the {{context}} package is imported more 
> places.
> Go 1.7 was released 15 August 2016. Given Golang has had significant 
> performance improvements in most dot releases, I suspect most production 
> services stay reasonably up to date. Here at Periscope/Twitter we're on 
> go1.9.1, and we're a fairly large organization.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to