[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16324085#comment-16324085
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-4434:
----------------------------------------

Github user jeking3 commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1449
  
    See: https://github.com/apache/thrift/blob/master/build/docker/README.md
    
    Also, I am testing Ubuntu Artful with dotnet-sdk-2.1.4 which pulls in 
netcore-2.0.5 (we're on 2.0.2).
    We may be able to pull this dotnet sdk into the xenial image just as 
easily, especially if it fixes netcore server cross tests.
    
    I'd like to continue to run the cross test suite on the LTS release.  
Fortunately there's another coming out in a few months.


> Update .NET Core components, add tests for .Net Core library and .Net Core 
> compiler, fix bugs and build process
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-4434
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4434
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: .NETCore - Compiler, .NETCore - Library, Build Process
>         Environment: Windows, Linux, MacOS
>            Reporter: Volodymyr Gotra
>            Assignee: Volodymyr Gotra
>            Priority: Critical
>
> This pull request should:
> - highly improve the current version of .Net Core library and .Net Core 
> compiler and quality of code
> - improve and simplify build process
> - improve documentation related to .Net Core library and compiler
> - fix found bugs (some of bugs can be clarified like major - they are related 
> to porting of protocols from Java version and can be present in C# library)
> - add important unit tests for .Net Core library and .Net Core compiler
> - add possibility to easy add unit tests for compiler for other languages



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to