[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16719037#comment-16719037
 ] 

James E. King III commented on THRIFT-4675:
-------------------------------------------

Sounds okay to me; make sure there are tests. :)

> JS code generators not handling int64 type properly for constants and for 
> TypeScript type mappings
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-4675
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4675
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JavaScript - Compiler
>    Affects Versions: 0.11.0
>            Reporter: Buğra Gedik
>            Priority: Major
>
> The code generated for JS constants involving the {{int64}} Thrift type do 
> not rely on the {{Int64}} JS type (from the {{node-int64}} package Thrift 
> uses for handling 64-bit integers). 
> For example, consider the following Thrift constant definitions:
> {code}
>     const i64 MAX_INT64 = 9223372036854775807
>     const i64 SMALL_INT64 = 15
> {code}
> This results in generating the following code:
> For node.js:
> {code}
>     ttypes.MAX_INT64 = 9223372036854775807;  
>     ttypes.SMALL_INT64 = 15;  
> {code}
> For the browser:
> {code}
>     MAX_INT64 = 9223372036854775807;
>     SMALL_INT64 = 15;  
> {code}
> Since the JS {{number}} type cannot natively represent integers that do not 
> fit into a double precision floating point, this will result in lost 
> precision for certain values. E.g., printing {{MAX_INT64}} would produce 
> {{922337203685477}}*{{6000}}*. 
> The correct output should be (showing for node.js):
> {code}
>     ttypes.MAX_INT64 = new Int64(''7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF'');  
>     ttypes.SMALL_INT64 = new Int64(15);  
> {code}
> Besides this, none of the Typescript type bindings ({{.d.ts}} files) contain 
> the types for int64 types. This includes constants, types, and service method 
> parameters. 
> Note that fixing this may break some of the existing code. In my mind, this 
> is how it should work by default, but I don't know the policy in Thrift 
> regarding backward compatibility. It could also be added as an option.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to