[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16755462#comment-16755462
 ] 

James E. King III commented on THRIFT-4405:
-------------------------------------------

First of all, +1 for proper use of vis-รก-vis.
(my former CEO said it all the time)

Secondly, an overflow number in int32_t is as unique as any other sequence 
number.
As long as the server handles the negative number properly, it is okay.
I will add to my tests for this, setting the initial request ID to INT32_MAX - 
10, and letting the cross test cause an overflow to negative numbers.

> Proper use of sequence IDs in all clients and servers
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-4405
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4405
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Test Suite
>    Affects Versions: 0.10.0
>         Environment: docker ubuntu-xenial
>            Reporter: James E. King III
>            Assignee: James E. King III
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Create a feature test that verifies sequence numbers are used properly.  
> Write a server that verifies clients are generating unique sequence IDs.  
> Write a client that makes sure servers return the same sequence ID that was 
> given.
> To do this, I enhanced the C++ TProcessorEventHandler class to include a 
> preReadSeq, which is like preRead but carries the sequence ID.
> In the C++ TestServer, I check to see if the sequence numbers are unique and 
> do not repeat; if any of them do, the cpp test fails.
> The following languages properly send sequence IDs (for the binary protocol):
> * dart
> * go
> * nodejs
> * java
> * rs
> The rest of the languages do not.  Now, one could argue that unless a 
> language has a concurrent-safe client and server, sequence IDs are 
> unnecessary.  While that is true, all languages should respect that the 
> protocol has a sequence ID and there could be future implementations that 
> will require all clients are well-behaved, which is why I am putting this 
> test in.
> Languages fixed up so unique sequence IDs are sent by the client, and 
> verified by the tests:
> * cpp (was only sending unique sequence IDs for Concurrent clients, now it 
> does for the regular one too)
> * csharp (seqid_ was not bring incremented with each use)
> * lua (seqid_ was not bring incremented with each use)
> * perl (seqid_ was not bring incremented with each use)
> * ruby (seqid_ was not bring incremented with each use and a unit test was 
> updated to no longer be pending)
> Languages left to do:
> * c_glib
> * erlang
> * haskell
> * php
> * python
> * python3
> * any non-cross tested languages



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to