[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thibault Piana updated THRIFT-4802:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: (was: Thrift-deployment-workflow.png)
> Automatic library deployment on online CDN/Repository services
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-4802
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4802
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Deployment
> Affects Versions: 0.12.0
> Reporter: Thibault Piana
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: cdn, deploy,deployment, library
> Attachments: Workflow.png
>
>
> Hello everyone,
> This thread follows some other threads dealing with concerns about online
> libraries (THRIFT-4688, THRIFT-4687), as well as emails being sent to the
> user mailing list about the Docker container on DockerHub.
> If I understand the situation correctly, at the moment, with each new version
> of the software, you must prepare and update each library on each website
> independently.
> In addition, each of those libraries is managed by different people, with
> whom contact is not always easy.
> Also, I would like to propose here a system that would offer the following
> advantages:
> - No more worrying about who is maintaining each platform
> - No more manual uploading on each platform at each release
> - Allow anyone to develop an extension to put a Thrift package online on a
> particular site (For example, a version for Yocto as I requested in a recent
> email), and be sure this package will be updated at each new release.
> I will try to explain my idea in the following.
> h2. Vocabulary
> * *CDN :* Content delivery network
> * *Manager :* An algorithm to upload content to a CDN/online repository
> * *Orchestrator :* The algorithm that orchestrates the execution of
> managers, provides credentials, manages manager feedback, and generates the
> final report
> * *Package* : The library/component we want to upload on the CDN
> In the following, all online resources providers/repositories (like Pypi,
> NPMJs, DockerHub ...) will be called "CDN"
> h2. General principle
> The idea would be to develop a single interface for module deployment, with
> an orchestrator to automatically configure and perform these deployments.
> The organization would be like this :
> * A Keepass database will store all passwords/identifiers required for each
> platform (NPMJS, Pypi, DockerHub, ...) :
> ** Each module will specify what credentials it needs from this database.
> ** This database could be committed directly on the repo, to be sure each
> committers have the most recent version.
> ** The master password of this database will only be known by committers (or
> project chair).
>
> I think KeePass is quite perfect for this, Keepass databases are very
> lightweight, highly secure, and almost impossible to brute-force.
> * For each CDN, a manager is in charge of bundling (create the package to
> upload from Thrift current release sources), uploading and checking the
> package on the CDN :
> ** First, the orchestrator load required IDs from the KeePass database
> ** The orchestrator creates a temporary directory where the manager will be
> able to bundle everything it needs.
> *** The manager receives credentials, a path to a temporary directory and a
> path to Thrift sources
> *** The manager checks online if the current version of the package already
> exists online. If not, it will upload it
> *** The manager prepares the bundled package, upload it and check if
> everything went well.
> All these steps could be executed in a dedicated Docker/Vagrant environment
> containing all needed libraries to bundle the package (So that the
> person/commiter executing the script does not have to download 500
> dependencies).
> The algorithm diagram is provided in attached (it's a draft)
> The directory structure of this solution could be something like this (I
> chose Python arbitrarily here):
> {code:java}
> root
> └── deployment/
> ├── access.kdbx
> ├── deploy.py
> ├── libraries # Some managers
> │ ├── javascript
> │ │ ├── npm.py
> │ │ ├── bower.py
> │ │ └── a_random_cdn.py
> │ ├── nodejs
> │ │ └── npm.py
> │ └── python
> │ └── pypi.js
> │ └── ...
> └── miscellaneous # Some other managers
> ├── docker
> │ └── docker.py
> └── yocto
> └── yocto.py
> └── ...{code}
> I am not a regular contributor on open source projects. So I don't know if
> I'm making my proposal in the best way. But I really like this project and I
> would like to help improve it
> I had this idea based on what had been put in place in a project I was
> recently leading. It is not perfect but does the job properly, and it's a
> solution I find quite elegant because we don't have to worry about the
> credentials of each site.
> If you find this idea interesting, I could propose a prototype in a personal
> repository with some examples of managers for Npm, Pypi, and DockerHub (for
> example) in several weeks.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
