[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16864466#comment-16864466
]
Jens Geyer commented on THRIFT-4887:
------------------------------------
old
{code}
struct Item {
1:required string name;
2:required list<string> contents;
}
{code}
new
{code}
struct Item {
1:required string name;
2:required string image; // inserted and taking over
index 2
3:required list<string> contents; // renumbered from 2
}
{code}
Aside from the rest, that's something you definitely should not do. Essentially
you are breaking compatibility intentionally. First, you are reassigning field
indices, second you are adding new required fields that an old client cannot
deliver. That can't work ever. It should also not OOM, though.
> Thrift will OOM at a low concurrency if fields added and old client requests
> new server
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-4887
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4887
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Bug
> Environment: Almost all versions from 0.8.0 to the newest
> 0.13.0-snapshot, and verify on 0.9.3/0.11.0.
> Almost all languages, and verified on Go/Java
> Reporter: aqingsir
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: readI32.jpg
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> (Could see more on [https://github.com/aqingsao/thrift-oom])
> //background
> A serious issue occured in our prod env and finally it came out to be the
> changement of some fields in an IDL file, old client still requested new
> server and crashed due to OOM.
> IDL changement could be stated as: Return value of the interface is a list,
> element of which is a struct object and has 5 fields. A new field is added to
> the middle of the struct.
> // to reproduce
> In this case a low concurency of 10 will reproduce this issue, you could find
> a demo project on: [https://github.com/aqingsao/thrift-oom]
> // reason
> Thrift tries to consume all data in inputstream by skipping fields that are
> redundant or have a type mismatch. But it won't consume subsequent fields if
> there's an exception.
> In such a case Thrift does nothing the underlying inputstream, so trouble
> comes to the next request who reuses this connection, as the cursor still
> points to some middle position of the inputstream.
> As Thrift always starts with a readI32() method for any response, which means
> the length of the method's name. Unbelievable the length could be as large as
> 184549632, which is about 176M. This explains why OOM occurs even at a
> concurrency of 10
> // how to fix
> Always clear inputstream in TSocket if there are any redundant data at the
> end of a method call.
> I'll submit a PR soon for Java version.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
