[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16964847#comment-16964847
 ] 

DAvid Furey commented on THRIFT-4989:
-------------------------------------

Since the Swift library will only ever be serialising data based on classes 
generated by the thrift swift compiler, I think it reasonable for the Swift 
library to rely on the properties being in a particular order order for writes.

The Java language binding sends fields in ascending order by key/id regardless 
of what order they are in the original thrift definition file.

I haven't tested, but I think the Swift library supports fields in any order 
when deserialising TCompactProtocol, so it should not have no compatibility 
issue if there are other language bindings that send data with a different 
ordering.

> Run time exception when using TCompactProtocol
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-4989
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4989
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Swift - Compiler
>    Affects Versions: 0.13.0
>            Reporter: DAvid Furey
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When serialising a struct using the TCompactProtocol we have discovered a 
> run-time error on line 
> [https://github.com/apache/thrift/blob/08a6eb6e1f21aa15682e414e124d7ee1a51a39c7/lib/swift/Sources/TCompactProtocol.swift#L474]
> The Swift implementation of TCompactProtocol assumes that the properties of 
> autogenerated classes for Thrift Structs will be ordered by field key, but 
> the current behaviour of the generator preserves the order from the original 
> thrift definitions  These are not required to be ordered by field key.
> Either the Swift lib needs to check for out-of-order properties, or the 
> generator should order properties.  Since the generator is only executed once 
> and the Swift lib runs every time a message is serialised, I think it makes 
> more sense to make this change in the generator.
>  I've made the necessary change, and will soon open a PR.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to