[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-5164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17134422#comment-17134422
]
Serhii Kanin commented on THRIFT-5164:
--------------------------------------
[~fishywang] thanks for the answer, so we are close to get a common
understanding.
{code:java}
defer func() { resp := respGen() //how will you know the response type as it is
different for every service method?
{code}
the same question about request type.
You suggest to have a dedicated middleware for every service method or
switch/case inside a middleware?
What's the reason to have a list middleware which are not generic and require
additional code for every new method.
Our solution is much better, since it is generic, once you implement a
loggerInterceptor you can reuse it everywhere, the same as in GRPC solution I
provided.
> Go middleware support
> ---------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-5164
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-5164
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Go - Library
> Reporter: Yuxuan Wang
> Assignee: Duru Can Celasun
> Priority: Major
> Labels: Breaking-Change
> Fix For: 0.14.0
>
> Time Spent: 2h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I saw that this idea was discussed before in THRIFT-4553, but want to reopen
> the discussion to see if there's a change of mind.
> We (Reddit) recently implemented TProcessor level middleware support in our
> Baseplate.go library, and we think that our implementation is generic enough
> that it might make sense to contribute that into the thrift library. The
> related implementation are all in this file:
> https://github.com/reddit/baseplate.go/blob/4225e42dc8dde56b222ac7ea3a4ff63aa726f6a6/thriftbp/middlewares.go
> https://github.com/reddit/baseplate.go/blob/4225e42dc8dde56b222ac7ea3a4ff63aa726f6a6/tracing/middlewares.go#L40-L64
> is an example of how a tracing middleware is implemented.
> If we think that's a good idea, then we can contribute that into thrift repo
> (with renames, of course). One implementation detail I'm not sure is that
> whether we want to expand the TProcessor interface to also include
> ProcessorMap and AddToProcessorMap, or do we want to keep the two iinterfaces
> separate.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
