Jens Geyer created THRIFT-5627: ---------------------------------- Summary: More consistent syntax for cpp_type Key: THRIFT-5627 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-5627 Project: Thrift Issue Type: Improvement Components: Compiler (General) Reporter: Jens Geyer Assignee: Jens Geyer
As a side effect on my current work I recognized a warning that was there before: Essentially it boils down to the list in these definitions taken from https://thrift.apache.org/docs/idl {code} [28] MapType ::= 'map' {color:#DE350B}CppType?{color} '<' FieldType ',' FieldType '>' [29] SetType ::= 'set' {color:#DE350B}CppType?{color} '<' FieldType '>' [30] ListType ::= 'list' '<' FieldType '>' {color:#DE350B}CppType?{color} {code} I wonder why we need it this way at all. Wouldn't it be better if list<> set<> and map<> would expect the same syntax? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)