Hi there Jan,

I was hoping to have time to spin it up by now, but haven't yet. Plus there's a 
ton of bug fixes 
and development going on, so I'm going to let things settle a bit. 

Jukka and I have been communicating with Sally and press@ and we hope to have a 
1.0 RC 
and release in time for ApacheCon NA 2011 in November, so I think that's the 
target. Would be
great to get it before then though!

Cheers,
Chris

On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm planning on upgrading Solr ExtractingHandler from Tika 0.8 to 0.9, for 
> next release. Is 1.0 close enough that I should wait, e.g. within next 3-4 
> weeks?
> 
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
> 
> On 3. aug. 2011, at 13:31, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>> <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>> If others have items on their 1.0 TODO list, please wrap them up in the 
>>> next week or so.
>>> I'll try and cut the 1.0 RC-1 by next weekend if that works for everyone.
>> 
>> Thanks for pushing this forward!
>> 
>> I'm back from a long vacation now and should be able to help clean up
>> things in preparation for the release. I think the main thing on my
>> part would be getting rid of the deprecated stuff on the Parser
>> interface and elsewhere, and of course come up with a migration
>> document that outlines how to update code that still uses the old
>> method signatures.
>> 
>> BR,
>> 
>> Jukka Zitting
> 


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to