Rian Stockbower created TIKA-1196:
-------------------------------------

             Summary: JAX-RS server only responds to queries to/from localhost
                 Key: TIKA-1196
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1196
             Project: Tika
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: server
    Affects Versions: 1.4
         Environment: Mac OS X, Windows Server 2008
            Reporter: Rian Stockbower
            Priority: Minor


I'm not sure if this is a problem with the Tika JAX-RS server, or with how it 
uses CXF under the hood. Anyway:

I have a large text extraction job (10-15 million documents) that I'm using the 
web service for. It would be nice to be able to distribute this horizontally 
across multiple nodes to speed up the processing. I had thought to have a job 
queue with a couple consumers, farming out PUT requests across several Tika web 
service endpoints.

But the JAX-RS web service will only respond to queries made to 
{{http://localhost:9998/tika}}.

I can't call {{http://hostname:9998/tika}} -- even if it's still a local 
operation.

Here is a list of things I've tried:
* I changed line 89 of TikaServerCLI.java to compute the name of the host at 
runtime. No go: the server starts up, and immediately terminates.
* I changed line 89 of TikaServerCLI.java to be a hostname (not a FQDN), and 
re-compiled:
** {{mvn compile -rf :tika-server}} compiles successfully. Start up the server, 
and it terminates, just like when I tried to compute the hostname at runtime
** {{mvn install}} from the topmost Tika directory gets the service responding 
to both {{http://hostname:9998/tika}} and 
{{http://hostname.domain.net:9998/tika}} (Seemed weird, this is why I was 
thinking it was further up the chain in CXF?)

In a perfect world:
# The server should respond to any valid calls that make sense:
#* 127.0.0.1
#* localhost
#* hostname
#* host.domain.tld
#* ip_address
# An hostname invocation parameter could be used to limit how what the service 
responds to when it's started up. (A very optional, nice-to-have.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to