Nick,
Fixed in r1569788.
Speaking of pdf parser tests, let me know if you come across any shareable pdfs
that would be tests of TIKA-1232...looking for pdfs with:
1) with PDF/A conformance level
2) PDFExtensionVersion
3) conflicting pdf version in header vs. trailer (standard PDFParser should
handle this; NonSequentialParser is currently not reading the header version)
Cheers,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 10:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Failing test - PDFParserTest.testSequentialParser
Y. Sorry about that. Changing to > 15 now.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Burch [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Failing test - PDFParserTest.testSequentialParser
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> Did you, by chance, add a pdf to your local test-documents directory?
Yes! I have one uncommitted pdf in there
> There appear to be 16 pdfs in test-documents under parsers in trunk. The
> goal of that test was to make sure that the test-documents directory was
> set properly and there were actually x pdf documents tested. When
> someone adds a new pdf, that # will have to be incremented.
Hmm, if it were me, I'd probably have it check that there were at least a
minimum number there (15?), and check that one or two long standing ones
were found too? That ought to be less brittle WRT people prototyping new
PDF tests
Nick
