You got it. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message----- From: Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <dev@tika.apache.org> Date: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 6:40 AM To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <dev@tika.apache.org> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika 1.6 RC #2..today? >Hi Chris, > >I pushed the Maven artifacts: "3.11-beta2" is the version number. Please >give the old Apache Rsync repository (used by POI) a few hours until it >appears on Maven Central. > >Uwe > >----- >Uwe Schindler >H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >http://www.thetaphi.de >eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:mattm...@apache.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 4:45 PM >> To: dev@tika.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika 1.6 RC #2..today? >> >> OK, will roll the RC in a day. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Nick Burch <apa...@gagravarr.org> >> Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <dev@tika.apache.org> >> Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 7:41 AM >> To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <dev@tika.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika 1.6 RC #2..today? >> >> >On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: >> >> OK I've been watching dev fly by and I think it's time for RC #2 of >> >>1.6, which I'll spin today. >> > >> >If possible, I'd say wait another day. There's one more issue (see >> >private@) spotted in POI since 3.11 beta 1 that should be included in >> >Tika 1.6. The 3.11 beta 2 vote closes tomorrow, so if we can I'd >> >suggest we delay a day to get that fix in too >> > >> >Thanks >> >Nick > >