Ahh... Good points! +1 1.7 Tyler
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Nick Burch <apa...@gagravarr.org> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Tyler Palsulich wrote: > >> BTW, we don't have any x.y.z releases yet - should we just >>> call this 1.7? That's probably just as easy? >>> >> >> Both sound good to me. We don't want to run out of numbers < 2.0, though. >> ;) >> > > As long as we don't hit 1.FF, we're probably OK, it is 2 digit non zero > padded hex version numbers, right? ;-) > > (Seriously though, there's nothing wrong with 1.10 and subsequent friends!) > > Nick >
