[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14224678#comment-14224678 ]
Tim Allison edited comment on TIKA-1442 at 11/25/14 4:01 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------- This is a comparison of PDFBox 1.8.6 and PDFBox 1.8.8-SNAPSHOT build 145. This was run via Tika 1.7-SNAPSHOT which uses as default the classic parser. This was run against a random selection of 50,000 PDF files from the govdocs1 corpus. I'll post a comparison file of 1.8.8-SNAPSHOT-145 with classic vs. nonSeq shortly. It looks like there are only a few regressions, and many improvements. was (Author: talli...@mitre.org): This is a comparison of PDFBox 1.8.6 and PDFBox 1.8.8-SNAPSHOT build 145. This was run via Tika 1.7-SNAPSHOT which uses as default the classic parser. I'll post a comparison file of 1.8.8-SNAPSHOT-145 with classic vs. nonSeq shortly. It looks like there are only a few regressions, and many improvements. > Upgrade to PDFBox 1.8.8 > ----------------------- > > Key: TIKA-1442 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1442 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Tim Allison > Assignee: Tim Allison > Fix For: 1.8 > > Attachments: PDFBox_1_8_6VPDFBox_1_8_8-b145.xlsx, > PDFBox_1_8_8-ClassicVPDFBox_1_8_8-NonSeq.xlsx, > pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOT.xlsx, pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOTb.xlsx, > pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOTc.xlsx, pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOTc.zip > > > Given the regressions we identified in PDFBox 1.8.7, we should upgrade to > 1.8.8 as soon as it is ready. I'm tempted to call this a blocker on Tika > 1.7. Let's use this issue to carry on the discussion of regression testing > (if any further discussion is necessary) or any other prep that needs to > happen before 1.8.8's release. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)