[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830464#comment-15830464 ]
Bob Paulin edited comment on TIKA-2245 at 1/19/17 7:30 PM: ----------------------------------------------------------- [~grossws] In my experience OSGi is pretty unopinionated on logging. For exmaple Pax-logging is what I often use https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/display/ops4j/Using+pax+logging . SLF4J is supported was (Author: bobpaulin): [~grossws] In my experience OSGi is pretty unopinionated on logging. For exmaple Pax-logging is what I often use https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/display/ops4j/Using+pax+logging > Standardise logging > ------------------- > > Key: TIKA-2245 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2245 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: parser > Affects Versions: 1.14, 1.15 > Reporter: Matthew Caruana Galizia > Assignee: Konstantin Gribov > Labels: logging > > Tika parsers sometimes use Log4j's Logger, sometimes the JUL > (java.util.logging) Logger and sometimes SLF4j. > It would be better to standardise on a single facade, for the sake of not > having to configure multiple loggers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)