FWIW, I believe there is some history on this but can’t find it right now. I thought we discussed X.Y.Z versionining at one point and decided against it.
I have no objections to it however. Aloha, Chris On 6/2/17, 2:39 PM, "Tyler Bui-Palsulich" <tbpalsul...@gmail.com> wrote: +1 to 1.15.1. It would also be nice to be able to have "cheap" security releases as they come up. Tyler On Jun 2, 2017 6:12 AM, "Bob Paulin" <b...@bobpaulin.com> wrote: > Would be breaking a bit from the current release numbering but I'd fully > support moving to semantic versioning. +1 to a 1.15.1 > > - Bob > > > On 6/2/2017 8:06 AM, Luís Filipe Nassif wrote: > > Maybe 1.15.1? > > > > Em 1 de jun de 2017 10:03 AM, "Bob Paulin" <b...@bobpaulin.com> escreveu: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> > >> On 6/1/2017 6:50 AM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote: > >>> Given the broken OSGi and the org.json issues with 1.15, does it make > >> sense to aim for 1.16 fairly soon, say 3-4 weeks? > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> Tim > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >