+1 for 1.16.

Tyler

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Allison, Timothy B. <talli...@mitre.org>
wrote:

> All,
>   I think we're now solidly at 1.16.  Anyone still strongly in favor of
> 1.15.1?
>
> Chris,
>   Will age detection be ready soon, or should we push that to 1.17?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:talli...@mitre.org]
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 7:01 AM
> To: dev@tika.apache.org; lfcnas...@gmail.com
> Subject: RE: Tika 1.15.1? -> 1.16
>
> Y, I was thinking that I may have already pushed us over this threshold
> with the * below.  1.16 it is then?
>
> Chris, let us know when the age detection is good to go or if 1.17 is a
> better target.
>
>
>   * Allow extraction of scripts as embedded "MACRO". Users
>     must turn this on via TikaConfig (TIKA-2391).
>
>   * Allow users to turn off extraction of headers and footers
>     from .doc, .docx, .xls, .xlsx, .xlsb (TIKA-2362)
>
>   * Extract text from charts in .docx, .pptx, .xlsx and .xlsb
>     (TIKA-2254).
>
>   * Extract text from diagrams in .docx, .pptx, .xlsx and .xlsb
>     (TIKA-1945).
>
>   * Enable base32 encoding of digests and enable BouncyCastle
> implementations
>     of digest algorithms (TIKA-2386).
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luís Filipe Nassif [mailto:lfcnas...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 4:12 PM
> To: dev@tika.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1?
>
> Agreed.
>
> Luis
>
>
> 2017-06-29 15:45 GMT-03:00 Bob Paulin <b...@bobpaulin.com>:
>
> > If we're adding features does it make sense just to bump to 1.16
> > rather than 1.15.1?  Traditionally point releases would be bug fixes
> only [1].
> >
> >
> > - Bob
> >
> > [1] http://semver.org/
> > On 6/29/2017 1:18 PM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> > > K.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010)
> > > [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 1:59 PM
> > > To: dev@tika.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1?
> > >
> > > Hey Tim, I’d like to try and get in:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1988
> > >
> > > today for 15.1. I am working on integrating it now and adding some
> > > docs
> > to the wiki.
> > >
> > > I’ll keep you posted.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > ++++++++++++++
> > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> > > Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
> > Manager, NSF & Open Source Projects Formulation and Development
> > Offices
> > (8212) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> > > Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-503
> > > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
> > > WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > ++++++++++++++
> > > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
> > > Adjunct
> > Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of
> > Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> > > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > ++++++++++++++
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/28/17, 12:24 PM, "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >     POI is available on maven, and I just upgraded.
> > >
> > >     Unless there are objections, I'll change our
> > >
> > >     org.apache.tika.parser.sentiment.analysis.SentimentParser
> > >
> > >     to
> > >
> > >
> > > org.apache.tika.parser.sentiment.analysis.SentimentAnalysisParser
> > >
> > >     and we should be good to go for 1.15.1?
> > >
> > >     Let me know if you'd like to hold off for a bit, but there's
> > > always
> > 1.15.2.       :)
> > >
> > >     Cheers,
> > >
> > >                   Tim
> > >
> > >     -----Original Message-----
> > >     From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010)
> > > [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
> > ]
> > >     Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 3:39 PM
> > >     To: dev@tika.apache.org
> > >     Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1?
> > >
> > >     Let me get back to you I’d like to see if we can get some
> > > progress
> > on the Age Detector Parser
> > >
> > >     ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > ++++++++++++++
> > >     Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> > >     Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office
> > > (3010)
> > Manager, NSF & Open Source Projects Formulation and Development
> > Offices
> > (8212) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> > >     Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-503
> > >     Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
> > >     WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> > >     ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > ++++++++++++++
> > >     Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
> > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of
> > Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> > >     WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
> > >     ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > ++++++++++++++
> > >
> > >
> > >     On 6/23/17, 10:01 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >         All,
> > >           With the exception of the SentimentParser (which we have a
> > path forward on), I think we're good to go.  It looks like POI is
> > about to kick off the release process for 3.17-beta1, and the batch
> > results look good.  I propose waiting a week or so to incorporate that.
> > >           Anything else we need to get in for 1.15.1?
> > >
> > >                  Cheers,
> > >
> > >                           Tim
> > >
> > >         -----Original Message-----
> > >         From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:mattm...@apache.org]
> > >         Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 2:43 PM
> > >         To: dev@tika.apache.org
> > >         Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1?
> > >
> > >         Yep agreed on both Tim. If I don’t get it done this weekend,
> > we’ll apply the approach you mention below.
> > >
> > >         Great seeing you yesterday!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >         On 6/16/17, 11:40 AM, "Allison, Timothy B."
> > > <talli...@mitre.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >             All,
> > >
> > >             I'm hoping to wrap up the TEIParser next week (I'm
> > > thinking
> > about modifying code to handle DOM)...and this should rid us of
> > org.json licensing issues.  Run a release for 1.15.1 probably the
> following week?
> > >
> > >             Anything else we want to get in to 1.15.1?
> > >
> > >             Chris, I'm not sure where you are on the SentimentParser.
> > If there will be a quick fix, great; otherwise, we should be ok with
> > the added exclusions (TIKA-2397) and if we rename the class in Tika so
> > that we don't have a conflict over oat.parsers.SentimentParser
> (TIKA-2368).
> > >
> > >             Cheers,
> > >
> > >                       Tim
> > >
> > >             -----Original Message-----
> > >             From: Tyler Bui-Palsulich [mailto:tbpalsul...@gmail.com]
> > >             Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 8:39 PM
> > >             To: dev@tika.apache.org
> > >             Subject: Re: Tika 1.16?
> > >
> > >             +1 to 1.15.1.
> > >
> > >             It would also be nice to be able to have "cheap"
> > > security
> > releases as they come up.
> > >
> > >             Tyler
> > >
> > >             On Jun 2, 2017 6:12 AM, "Bob Paulin" <b...@bobpaulin.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >             > Would be breaking a bit from the current release
> > > numbering
> > but I'd
> > >             > fully support moving to semantic versioning.  +1 to a
> > 1.15.1
> > >             >
> > >             > - Bob
> > >             >
> > >             >
> > >             > On 6/2/2017 8:06 AM, Luís Filipe Nassif wrote:
> > >             > > Maybe 1.15.1?
> > >             > >
> > >             > > Em 1 de jun de 2017 10:03 AM, "Bob Paulin" <
> > b...@bobpaulin.com> escreveu:
> > >             > >
> > >             > >> +1
> > >             > >>
> > >             > >>
> > >             > >> On 6/1/2017 6:50 AM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> > >             > >>> Given the broken OSGi and the org.json issues with
> > 1.15, does it
> > >             > >>> make
> > >             > >> sense to aim for 1.16 fairly soon, say 3-4 weeks?
> > >             > >>> Cheers,
> > >             > >>>
> > >             > >>>           Tim
> > >             > >>>
> > >             > >>>
> > >             > >>
> > >             > >>
> > >             >
> > >             >
> > >             >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to