[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16380752#comment-16380752
]
Md commented on TIKA-207:
-------------------------
I am using tika 1.17 but still it's getting deleted text from track revised
files. Is there a way to exclude deleted test from tracked revised files.
> MS word doc containing tracked changes produces incorrect text
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-207
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-207
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: parser
> Affects Versions: 0.3
> Environment: tika-0.3-standalone.jar
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Jukka Zitting
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.10
>
> Attachments: TIKA-207.patch, TIKA-207.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from this discussion:
>
> http://n2.nabble.com/getting-text-from-MS-Word-docs-with-tracked-changes...-td2463811.html
> When extracting text from an MS Word doc (2003 format) that has
> unapproved pending changes, the text from both old and new is glommed
> together.
> EG I had a doc that contained text "Field.Index.TOKENIZED", and I
> changed TOKENIZED to ANALYZED with track changes enabled, and
> then when I extract text (using TikaCLI) it produces this:
> Field.Index.TOKENIZEDANALYZED
> So, first, it'd be nice to at least get whitespace inserted between
> old & new text.
> And, second, it'd be great to have an option to control whether it's
> old or new text that's indexed (or at least an option to only see
> "new" text, ie the current document).
> From the discussion above, it seems like POI may expose the
> fine-grained APIs to allow Tika to do this; it's just that Tika's not
> leveraging these APIs for MS Word docs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
