[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721728#comment-16721728
]
Hudson commented on TIKA-2798:
------------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika-trunk #1609 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Tika-trunk/1609/])
TIKA-2798 -- improve reporting for attachment diffs (tallison:
[https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/398bcd8566d3028a9554a459f5c49a51fb45528f])
* (edit) tika-eval/src/main/resources/comparison-reports.xml
> Consider reverting junrar
> -------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-2798
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2798
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: AQRJRPYMH3PNNK2HLOOKKR4B3QOVWOUH_1_19_1.rar.json,
> AQRJRPYMH3PNNK2HLOOKKR4B3QOVWOUH_1_20.rar.json,
> attachment_diffs_no_exceptions.xlsx, attachment_diffs_with_exceptions.xlsx
>
>
> [~lfcnassif] noticed junrar regressions in the pre-1.20-rc1 regression
> reports. Let's figure out what's going on and consider reverting the
> "upgrade".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
