On Wed, 25 Dec 2019, Tilman Hausherr wrote:
Hello Jens,
Thank you again, I have corrected all I wanted to, and created one issue for
a false positive
https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell/issues/1399
Tilman
Yes, that is a false positive but I assume that the issue isn't easily to
solve since "codespell" claims to be "designed primarily for checking
misspelled words in source code" but the context recognition seems
currently to be improvable.
So it's more my error while manually pre-checking for false positives.
I let ignore now also "endianess" and "instanciate" and the current result
(with the very good rating grade: "A") can be found here:
https://fossies.org/linux/test/pdfbox-trunk.zip/codespell.html
https://fossies.org/linux/test/pdfbox-trunk-a6bc826.191225.zip/codespell.html
Regards
Jens
Am 15.12.2019 um 16:33 schrieb Fossies Administrator:
Hi Tilman,
Thank you! I've now corrected all typos except those related to variable
/ method names (want to keep API stability), "Cloneable
<https://fossies.org/linux/misc/pdfbox-2.0.17-src.zip/codespell.html#Cloneable>"
(that is in java itself LOL) and a few that are in resource files (these
are text extractions, i.e. the typos are in the original PDF, e.g.
PDFBOX-3044-010197-p5-ligatures.pdf).
Oops, that file I have overseen and "Cloneable" is now also ignored.
Yes, I would like to have a report for the trunk too, although I don't
expect much new typos.
A new "false positive" word "hIST" is now ignored but for better
comparability I have leaved all other unchanged.
Here the main URLs for trunk checked out today Sunday at 14:59 CET.
https://fossies.org/linux/test/pdfbox-trunk.zip/codespell.html
https://fossies.org/linux/test/pdfbox-trunk.191215_1459.zip/codespell.html
Looks much better!
Regards
Jens
Am 11.12.2019 um 21:50 schrieb Fossies Administrator:
Hi Tilman,
Am 10.12.2019 um 16:51 schrieb Fossies Administrator:
Although such reports are normally only generated on request
Hello, can we also get this for Apache PDFBox? I've corrected typos
when
I hit them, but I can't look everywhere.
https://github.com/apache/pdfbox/
or
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/
The PDFBox is used by the Tika project, and has people common to both
projects.
Although Fossies has now also the possibilty to create such reports in
a
special test folder that isn't integrated in the Fossies standard
services
and should hopefully also not accessible by search engines, that
package
is now included in the main Fossies folder "/linux/misc":
https://fossies.org/linux/misc/pdfbox-2.0.17-src.zip/
The according codespell URLs are
https://fossies.org/linux/misc/pdfbox/codespell.html
currently redirecting to
https://fossies.org/linux/misc/pdfbox-2.0.17-src.zip/codespell.html
and
https://fossies.org/linux/misc/pdfbox-2.0.17-src.zip/codespell_conf.html
https://fossies.org/linux/misc/pdfbox-2.0.17-src.zip/codespell_fps.html
If it would be meaningful to do a codespell check for e.g. for the
"trunk"
version so let it know me and I can do that in the mentioned
"/linux/test"
folder.
Regards
Jens
