[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17684937#comment-17684937
]
Ross Johnson commented on TIKA-3968:
------------------------------------
For what it's worth, the .emf files do look to contain the original file names
within a special sequence of EMR_COMMENT records near the end of the files. For
example, image3.emf ends with the following records:
!image-2023-02-06-15-46-05-678.png!
> Reconstruct embedded file names from recent docx files
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-3968
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3968
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: Microsoft_Word_Document.docx,
> image-2023-02-06-15-46-05-678.png, image1.emf, image2.emf, image3.emf,
> oleObject1.bin, oleObject2.bin, testWORD has attachment.docx
>
>
> I'm starting to see among several users communicating with me privately that
> Microsoft has changed their basic behavior for files attached to at least
> docx files (possibly pptx and xlsx?). Rather than storing the original file
> name, the file associates an EMF file with an attachment. The filename that
> a human sees in the application is spelled/painted out in the EMF file, but
> does NOT exist in any of the XML.
> I'm attaching an example file.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
