[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17766906#comment-17766906 ]
Thorsten Heit commented on TIKA-4134: ------------------------------------- Personally I'm no fan of fat jars so if you'd ask me, replace them by *.tar.gz ;) But, as you said, in the first step *.tar.gz files could be added and the fat jars marked as being deprecated. > Maybe move away from an uber jar for tika-app and tika-server-standard in 3.x? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: TIKA-4134 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4134 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Tim Allison > Priority: Major > > On https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/1345#issuecomment-1723321327, > [~desruisseaux] pointed out that uber jars might not be the best idea with > jpms in the future. > I'm opening this issue to discuss if we want to change the packaging > structure in 3.x. > If we wanted to "go small" we can keep things as they are in 3.x and warn > users that we might move away from an uber jar in 4.x. > If we wanted to "go big", we could use the maven dependency plugin to create > a "lib/" directory with all of the dependencies and then have a small > tika-app.jar that includes those dependencies in its classpath. > Are there other, better ways that we should think about packaging tika-app > and tika-server in 3.x and beyond? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)