[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18071785#comment-18071785
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TIKA-4705:
--------------------------------------
iachimoe opened a new pull request, #2750:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/2750
…rent directories of its parent gzip file, plus fixing typo where '.' was
missing from gz extension
<!--
Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
distributed with this work for additional information
regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
"License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
software distributed under the License is distributed on an
"AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
specific language governing permissions and limitations
under the License.
-->
Thanks for your contribution to [Apache Tika](https://tika.apache.org/)!
Your help is appreciated!
Before opening the pull request, please verify that
* there is an open issue on the [Tika issue
tracker](https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TIKA) which describes the
problem or the improvement. We cannot accept pull requests without an issue
because the change wouldn't be listed in the release notes.
* the issue ID (`TIKA-XXXX`)
- is referenced in the title of the pull request
- and placed in front of your commit messages surrounded by square
brackets (`[TIKA-XXXX] Issue or pull request title`)
* commits are squashed into a single one (or few commits for larger changes)
* Tika is successfully built and unit tests pass by running `./mvnw clean
test`
* there should be no conflicts when merging the pull request branch into the
*recent* `main` branch. If there are conflicts, please try to rebase the pull
request branch on top of a freshly pulled `main` branch
* if you add new module that downstream users will depend upon add it to
relevant group in `tika-bom/pom.xml`.
We will be able to faster integrate your pull request if these conditions
are met. If you have any questions how to fix your problem or about using Tika
in general, please sign up for the [Tika mailing
list](http://tika.apache.org/mail-lists.html). Thanks!
> resourceName of tar file in nested tarball should not contain tarball's
> parent directories
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-4705
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4705
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Iachimoe
> Priority: Major
>
> Example structure:
> test-nested-tarball.tar contains:
> folderContainingTgz/inner/nested.tgz
>
> The resource name for nested.tgz would be
> `folderContainingTgz/inner/nested.tgz` , which is consistent with the general
> behaviour for nested archives (e.g. zips).
> However, if nested.tgz does not contain metadata specifying the name of the
> nested file within, then that file will have a resourceName of
> `folderContainingTgz/inner/nested.tar`. This is inconsistent with how other
> nested archives behave, because parent folders should are generally only
> included if they relate to the immediate parent archive. The parent archive
> of nested.tgz in this example is test-nested-tarball.tar , and that is why it
> makes sense for the folders to be included. However, the parent archive of
> nested.tar is nested.tgz , and there is no folder called folderContainingTgz
> within nested.tgz .
>
> Draft pull request with a unit test that hopefully makes the issue clear, and
> a proposed fix at https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/2730/changes
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
