I had to moderate Sergey through the first time so he may not have subscribed. Sergey, if you haven't been seeing the responses please check the archives. If you're still interested in contributing please subscribe to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list and let us know.
Thanks, Greg On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > since it looks like Tiles will be the proper home, this will be my > last cross-post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if anyone there wants to continue > following this, c'mon over to [EMAIL PROTECTED] :) > > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Antonio Petrelli > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2008/6/28 Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> VelocityTools 2 is extremely flexible at this point. Including a tool >>> that lives in a separate library is very easy. Tiles could even >>> include a tools.xml in its jar with the TilesTool configuration and >>> most standard VelocityTools 2 users would automatically pick up the >>> tool if they just add the tiles jar to their app. >> >> In fact I was thinking of a separate optional JAR, just like the >> "tiles-jsp.jar". Is it possible? > > yes, that would be excellent. > >>> Given that and the fact >>> that we're already supporting other view technologies in Tiles, i >>> think it would fit best here. I will, of course, help out with that >>> as much as possible. >> >> OK, remember that you are a PMC member of Tiles, too ;-) > > i remember :) > >>> Now, i realize that Sergey's code is for VelocityTools 1.x, but i do >>> think we should target VelocityTools 2. Tools 2.0-beta2 should be out >>> next week, and i don't intend for 2.0 GA to be far behind. >> >> +1 to use Tools 2, independently from your release schedule. >> >>> Also, >>> given the flexibility of Tools 2, it actually is pretty easy to have a >>> 1.x compatible version extend the 2.x version. >> >> I think that retrocompatibility depends on volunteers effort: if >> someone of us really *wants* to use Tools 1, then OK. >> >>> What do you think? >> >> I think we have left one important point: the codebase of the work >> made by Sergey lives outside of Apache, so probably an IP clearance >> process is necessary. > > agreed. though if we're not bring the spring integration code along, > there's just a few classes we'd adapt the code from. i suspect a JIRA > attachment with the proper box clicked and a CLA from Sergey should > probably suffice. it appears that he is the sole author and copyright > owner. is that right, Sergey? > >> Sergey, if you still want to contribute, do you simply want to donate >> your code (with obvious recognition in SVN logs and contributor page), >> or do you want to collaborate to create a Tiles 2 + VelocityTools 2 >> module? > > yep, it's your contribution, don't let us run the whole discussion here. :) > >> Either way, your contribute will really be appreciated :-) > > +1! > >> Thanks >> Antonio >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >
