+1 GA works well as far as my code goes, and i agree with Greg. we can downgrade later if someone else turns up a bug that our testing didn't. we shouldn't ever be afraid to put a GA label on things in which we see no significant problems.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Greg Reddin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Antonio Petrelli > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> [ ] Leave at test build >> [ ] Alpha >> [ ] Beta >> [X] General Availability (GA) > > +1 to GA. > > I can't say that I have *thoroughly* tested the build, but what I see > looks good. I will try to find some time to dig further. We can always > downgrade the release quality if we need to. But I understand your > worry - I always feel that way when I release new code :-) > > Greg >
