On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Antonio Petrelli <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > To follow the release plan that I wrote [1] the first step is to > branch the 2.1.x version to continue development in the trunk for the > future 2.2.0 version. This version will include native FreeMarker and > Velocity support for sure. > Moreover, i finished developing (not documenting, nor writing unit > tests) the native FreeMarker support currently in the sandbox [2]. > This module can be tested using a sandboxed version of the > "tiles-test" webapp [3]. > > So the questions are two: > 1) should we vote to branch the 2.1.x code?
no need; i consider this a "let them who do the work decide" thing. if you want/need a branch, just do it. > 2) should we vote to graduate the "tiles-freemarker" support from the > sandbox to the development trunk? no need; since it's already under our supervision, no vote is necessary. if a developer (you) thinks its ready and expects no objections, they (you) should be able to just do it. but again, on both of these things, as the one doing the work on these things, if you *want* to vote, that's your decision. :) > Thanks > Antonio > > [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TILES/Post+2.1.x+Release+Plan > [2] http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/tiles/sandbox/trunk/tiles-freemarker/ > [3] http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/tiles/sandbox/trunk/tiles-test-sandbox/ >
