On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: > --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: >> From: Matt Benson <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0 >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 1:18 PM >> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Nathan Bubna <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > From: Nathan Bubna <[email protected]> >> > Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0 >> > To: [email protected] >> > Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 1:10 PM >> > I see no problem with anyone >> > publishing snapshots. If you have access >> > to p.a.o and want to publish a snapshot there, go for >> > it. If you can >> > only publish snapshots elsewhere, go for it. >> Just >> > don't call it >> > "official" or a "release" or anything else of that >> sort, as >> > those must >> > be voted on by the PMC. But you already know >> that. >> > :) >> >> Hi Nathan. Thanks for your input; I've been working >> on building everything under the framework and have run into >> a few snags. First, I switched to the new Nexus >> install for snapshots, because maven-site-plugin >> 2.0-beta-8-SNAPSHOT wasn't at p.a.o snapshots... then, I >> still couldn't get 2.0-beta-8-SNAPSHOT to work, so I >> upgraded to 2.1-SNAPSHOT (this forced me to upgrade to mvn >> 2.1.0). Then the build kicked off. Now I am >> wrestling with the Velocity dependency; I may have to hit >> those guys up for a blessing to publish a 1.7-SNAPSHOT as >> well. >> > > ...and (having perused committers.html) you are one of those guys. ;)
Yep. Same opinion applies there. Publishing snapshots is limited only by your ability to do so and what you can call it. :) So, go for it! >> Thanks again, >> Matt >> >> > >> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matt Benson <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > You know, this might be somewhat irregular, but >> it >> > looks like any member of the apcvs group on p.a.o can >> > publish (legacy as opposed to Nexus) snapshots; I'd >> be >> > willing to make the attempt with the blessing of the >> PMC. >> > > >> > > -Matt >> > > >> > > --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Matt Benson <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> From: Matt Benson <[email protected]> >> > >> Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0 >> > >> To: [email protected] >> > >> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 12:12 PM >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Greg Reddin <[email protected]> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > From: Greg Reddin <[email protected]> >> > >> > Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0 >> > >> > To: [email protected] >> > >> > Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 11:07 AM >> > >> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM, >> > >> > Matt Benson <[email protected]> >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > I see from the archives I just >> managed >> > to get >> > >> on-list >> > >> > right after Antonio left. :) >> Just my >> > >> luck. I am >> > >> > interested in the native freemarker >> support >> > >> coming. Is >> > >> > there any chance 2.2.0 snapshots could >> be >> > >> published? If >> > >> > not I will build them locally. >> Finally, has >> > a >> > >> timeframe >> > >> > been established for 2.2.0 final? >> > >> > >> > >> > Currently, there's no timeframe set for >> > 2.2.0. Your >> > >> best >> > >> > bet right now >> > >> > would be to build locally. I'd be >> willing to >> > publish >> > >> a >> > >> > release if it >> > >> > *really* needs to happen and I can find >> all >> > the >> > >> needed >> > >> > steps to make >> > >> > it happen. >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> Well, assuming I can get the whole framework >> built >> > and >> > >> published to my local Nexus repo I can get by >> that >> > way for >> > >> quite some time before I personally need a >> > release. >> > >> Thanks. >> > >> >> > >> -Matt >> > >> >> > >> > Greg >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> > > > >
