Ted, when you say: "benchmarking harness so that it would be easy to swap various implementations"
do you mean like gremlin-benchmark would be useful to other graph providers? like UniPop could run gremlin-benchmark over its implementation and compare it to Titan? On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > If folks thought it was a good idea, I'd love to put together a little > benchmarking harness so that it would be easy to swap various > implementations & tweaks in and out to measure how they perform. For > example, benchmarks running against different #'s of vertex properties, > edge counts, # of properties / edge, measuring things like latency, size in > memory, and size on disk. I need to finish up TinkerPop-1254, but then I > could take a crack at this. I already have done some work towards this in > TinkerPop-1287 to confirm improvements from stream removal in key spots so > perhaps I could extend upon that. > > --Ted > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > TinkerPop 3.3.0 is not slated for anytime soon, but some buddies are > > interested in a making the serialization format of StarGraph more > > efficient. Given it would be a major breaking change, we can’t do it till > > TinkerPop 3.3.0, but we can talk about it and design it. Here is a ticket > > to get us underway. Your thoughts are more than welcome: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1343 < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1343> > > > > Take care, > > Marko. > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > > > > >
