[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15372807#comment-15372807 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1274: ------------------------------------------- Github user okram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/351 Adding my email on dev@ to here. I’m not following this PR too closely so what I might be saying is a already known/argued against/etc. 1. I think we should go with @robertdale proposal of int32, int64, Vertex, uuid, etc. instead of Java class names. 2. In Java we then have a `Map<String,Class>` for typecasting accordingly. 3. This would make GraphSON 2.0 perfect for Bytecode serialization in TINKERPOP-1278. 4. I think that if a Vertex, Edge, etc. doesn’t have properties, outV, etc. then don’t even have those fields in the representation. 5. Most of the serialization back and forth will be `ReferenceXXX` elements and thus, don’t create more Maps/lists for no reason. — less chars. For me, my interests with this work is all about a language agnostic way of sending Gremlin traversal bytecode between different languages. This work is exactly what I am looking for. > GraphSON Version 2.0 > -------------------- > > Key: TINKERPOP-1274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1274 > Project: TinkerPop > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 3.1.2-incubating > Reporter: stephen mallette > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.2.1 > > > Develop a revised version of GraphSON that provides better support for > non-JVM languages that consume it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)