[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15372807#comment-15372807
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1274:
-------------------------------------------
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/351
Adding my email on dev@ to here.
I’m not following this PR too closely so what I might be saying is a
already known/argued against/etc.
1. I think we should go with @robertdale proposal of int32, int64,
Vertex, uuid, etc. instead of Java class names.
2. In Java we then have a `Map<String,Class>` for typecasting
accordingly.
3. This would make GraphSON 2.0 perfect for Bytecode serialization in
TINKERPOP-1278.
4. I think that if a Vertex, Edge, etc. doesn’t have properties, outV,
etc. then don’t even have those fields in the representation.
5. Most of the serialization back and forth will be `ReferenceXXX`
elements and thus, don’t create more Maps/lists for no reason. — less chars.
For me, my interests with this work is all about a language agnostic way of
sending Gremlin traversal bytecode between different languages. This work is
exactly what I am looking for.
> GraphSON Version 2.0
> --------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1274
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1274
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: io
> Affects Versions: 3.1.2-incubating
> Reporter: stephen mallette
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2.1
>
>
> Develop a revised version of GraphSON that provides better support for
> non-JVM languages that consume it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
