I also recall Daniel mentioning in a post that .store() in OLAP works like .aggregate() in OLTP so this change could help users distinguish between both worlds and BFS/DFS.
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016, Dylan Millikin <dylan.milli...@gmail.com> wrote: > yeah I like the barrier().store() best as well. > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Musso <jbmu...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > I think barrier().store() for .aggregate() is very appropriate and fully > > tells what is going on. > > > > I like both, +1 for one or the other. > > > > People also tend to confuse .as() and .store()/.aggregate(). > > > > On Tuesday, 20 September 2016, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was thinking that store() and aggregate() should simply be “store().” > > > > > > store() -> store(local) > > > aggregate() -> store(global) > > > > > > Or: > > > > > > aggregate() -> barrier().store() > > > > > > Random thoughts… > > > > > > Marko. > > > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste > > > -- Jean-Baptiste
