Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP-1482:
---------------------------------------------
Summary: has(x).has(y) chains should be has(x.and(y))
Key: TINKERPOP-1482
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1482
Project: TinkerPop
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: process
Affects Versions: 3.2.2
Reporter: Marko A. Rodriguez
Lots of work has been done to inline filters for 3.2.3. A final application
should be to inline {{has(x).has(y)}} into {{has(x.and(y))}}. If this is done,
providers may have significant breaking changes as they will need to search
{{HasContainers}} beyond {{P.eq()}} to walking an and/or-tree. However, the
benefit of this grouping is two fold:
1. Its a clean, consistent composition.
2. It reduces the number of {{HasContainers}} and {{HasSteps}} in areas where
provider "fold-ins" are not being used.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
