[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Daniel Kuppitz updated TINKERPOP-1529:
--------------------------------------
    Description: 
There are scenarios where {{LazyBarrierStrategy}} changes the semantics of a 
traversal:

{noformat}
gremlin> g = TinkerFactory.createModern().traversal()
==>graphtraversalsource[tinkergraph[vertices:6 edges:6], standard]
gremlin> g.V().store("a").out().select("a")
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
{noformat}

This is actually not the result of {{store()}}, this is {{aggregate()}}. The 
expected result for {{store()}} would be:

{noformat}
==>[v[1]]
==>[v[1]]
==>[v[1]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
{noformat}

Another issue, which should probably go into another ticket, is this:

{noformat}
gremlin> 
g.withoutStrategies(LazyBarrierStrategy).V().store("a").out().select("a")
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
{noformat}

That's it, the console is hanging at this point. Looks like 
{{PathRetractionStrategy}} is the remaining troublemaker. With both strategies 
excluded, we get the expected result:

{noformat}
gremlin> g.withoutStrategies(LazyBarrierStrategy, 
PathRetractionStrategy).V().store("a").out().select("a")
==>[v[1]]
==>[v[1]]
==>[v[1]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
{noformat}

  was:
There are scenarios where {{LazyBarrierStrategy}} changes the semantics of a 
traversal:

{noformat}
gremlin> g = TinkerFactory.createModern().traversal()
==>graphtraversalsource[tinkergraph[vertices:6 edges:6], standard]
gremlin> g.V().store("a").out().select("a")
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
{noformat}

This is actually not the result of {{store()}}, this is {{aggregate()}}. The 
expected result for {{store()}} would be:

{noformat}
==>[v[1]]
==>[v[1],v[2]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
{noformat}

Another issue, which should probably go into another ticket, is this:

{noformat}
gremlin> 
g.withoutStrategies(LazyBarrierStrategy).V().store("a").out().select("a")
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
{noformat}

That's it, the console is hanging at this point. Looks like 
{{PathRetractionStrategy}} is the remaining troublemaker. But even if both 
strategies are excluded, the result is still not what I would expect:

{noformat}
gremlin> g.withoutStrategies(LazyBarrierStrategy, 
PathRetractionStrategy).V().store("a").out().select("a")
==>[v[1]]
==>[v[1]]
==>[v[1]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4]]
==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
{noformat}


> LazyBarrierStrategy is too agressive
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1529
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1529
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: process
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.3
>            Reporter: Daniel Kuppitz
>
> There are scenarios where {{LazyBarrierStrategy}} changes the semantics of a 
> traversal:
> {noformat}
> gremlin> g = TinkerFactory.createModern().traversal()
> ==>graphtraversalsource[tinkergraph[vertices:6 edges:6], standard]
> gremlin> g.V().store("a").out().select("a")
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
> {noformat}
> This is actually not the result of {{store()}}, this is {{aggregate()}}. The 
> expected result for {{store()}} would be:
> {noformat}
> ==>[v[1]]
> ==>[v[1]]
> ==>[v[1]]
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4]]
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4]]
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
> {noformat}
> Another issue, which should probably go into another ticket, is this:
> {noformat}
> gremlin> 
> g.withoutStrategies(LazyBarrierStrategy).V().store("a").out().select("a")
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
> {noformat}
> That's it, the console is hanging at this point. Looks like 
> {{PathRetractionStrategy}} is the remaining troublemaker. With both 
> strategies excluded, we get the expected result:
> {noformat}
> gremlin> g.withoutStrategies(LazyBarrierStrategy, 
> PathRetractionStrategy).V().store("a").out().select("a")
> ==>[v[1]]
> ==>[v[1]]
> ==>[v[1]]
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4]]
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4]]
> ==>[v[1],v[2],v[3],v[4],v[5],v[6]]
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to