[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15630562#comment-15630562
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1434:
-------------------------------------------

GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/479

    TINKERPOP-1434 Block calls on "remote" traversal to get side-effects

    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1434
    
    This prevents calls for side-effects that are not yet ready on the server. 
This was generally a problem in tests, but users could have also run afoul of 
the issue if they decided to get low-level with the API. It is more likely that 
they would grab side-effects with a call to `cap()` so this would be a 
non-issue in that case.
    
    Did multiple runs of `mvn clean install && mvn verify -pl gremlin-server 
-DincludeNeo4j -DskipIntegrationTests=false` and it passes nicely. I never saw 
the test failures that triggered the effort to produce a fix for this problem, 
so @dkuppitz who saw it regularly should give this a review. Also, if travis 
passes, that would be a good sign - the error was seen there sometimes as well. 
 Please be sure to use `-DincludeNeo4j` if re-running the tests.
    
    VOTE +1

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop TINKERPOP-1434

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/479.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #479
    
----
commit 46a61bb124d27aebcf96a639b2614e16389b02f9
Author: Stephen Mallette <sp...@genoprime.com>
Date:   2016-11-02T21:12:36Z

    TINKERPOP-1434 Block calls on "remote" traversal to get side-effects
    
    This prevents calls for side-effects that are not yet ready on the server. 
This was generally a problem in tests, but usrs could have also run afoul of 
the issue if they decided to get low-level with the API. It is more likely that 
they would grab side-effects with a call to cap() so this would be a non-issue 
in that case.

----


> Block calls to traversal side-effects until read is complete
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1434
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1434
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: driver
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.2
>            Reporter: stephen mallette
>            Assignee: stephen mallette
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Might make usability a little better if calls to {{getSideEffects()}} could 
> block until the remote {{Traversal}} complete iteration (i.e. on "read 
> complete") - or perhaps they return a {{Future}} or something.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to