[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15634798#comment-15634798 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1292: ------------------------------------------- Github user okram commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/476#discussion_r86472253 --- Diff: neo4j-gremlin/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/neo4j/structure/Neo4jGraph.java --- @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ @Graph.OptIn(Graph.OptIn.SUITE_GROOVY_ENVIRONMENT_INTEGRATE) @Graph.OptIn(Graph.OptIn.SUITE_GROOVY_ENVIRONMENT_PERFORMANCE) @Graph.OptIn("org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.neo4j.NativeNeo4jSuite") -@Graph.OptIn("org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.neo4j.process.traversal.strategy.Neo4jStrategySuite") --- End diff -- Yes. It is not the model we use for `TraversalStrategy` testing. I converted both Neo4j and TinkerGraph's strategy tests to the model we use in `core/`. > TinkerGraphComputer VertexProgramInterceptors > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: TINKERPOP-1292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1292 > Project: TinkerPop > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: process, tinkergraph > Affects Versions: 3.2.0-incubating > Reporter: Marko A. Rodriguez > Fix For: 3.2.4 > > > Create {{TinkerGraphInterceptorStrategy}} for {{TinkerGraphComputer}} and > grow it starting with the two simple patterns below: > {code} > g.V().count() -> tinkerGraph.vertices.size() > g.E().count() -> tinkerGraph.edges.size() > {code} > In fact, perhaps even create {{TinkerGraphCountStep}} for OLTP as well that > does the above. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)