I'd say no, if you wanted it once you would have selected it once no? in sql `select a.name, a.name from Person a` will return name twice because that's what you asked for.
5 cents Pieter On 08/11/2016 14:02, Marko A. Rodriguez (JIRA) wrote: > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > ] > > Marko A. Rodriguez updated TINKERPOP-1541: > ------------------------------------------ > Summary: Select should default to Pop.last semantics (was: Should > repeated objects be returned for the same label?) > >> Select should default to Pop.last semantics >> ------------------------------------------- >> >> Key: TINKERPOP-1541 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1541 >> Project: TinkerPop >> Issue Type: Improvement >> Components: process >> Affects Versions: 3.2.3 >> Reporter: Marko A. Rodriguez >> Labels: breaking >> >> Check this out: >> {code} >> gremlin> g.V().as('a').select('a').as('a').select('a') >> ==>[v[1],v[1]] >> ==>[v[2],v[2]] >> ==>[v[3],v[3]] >> ==>[v[4],v[4]] >> ==>[v[5],v[5]] >> ==>[v[6],v[6]] >> {code} >> Shouldn't we just return the uniques? This is a big decision as this can >> cause massive rippling breakage for users :). > > > -- > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > (v6.3.4#6332)
