[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP-1482.
-----------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
Fix Version/s: 3.2.4
> has(x).has(y) chains should be has(x.and(y))
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1482
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1482
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.2.2
> Reporter: Marko A. Rodriguez
> Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
> Fix For: 3.2.4
>
>
> Lots of work has been done to inline filters for 3.2.3. A final application
> should be to inline {{has(x).has(y)}} into {{has(x.and(y))}}. If this is
> done, providers may have significant breaking changes as they will need to
> search {{HasContainers}} beyond {{P.eq()}} to walking an and/or-tree.
> However, the benefit of this grouping is two fold:
> 1. Its a clean, consistent composition.
> 2. It reduces the number of {{HasContainers}} and {{HasSteps}} in areas where
> provider "fold-ins" are not being used.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
