[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15805510#comment-15805510
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1585:
-------------------------------------------

Github user dkuppitz commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/524#discussion_r95006502
  
    --- Diff: 
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/filter/DedupGlobalStep.java
 ---
    @@ -89,6 +92,17 @@ public ElementRequirement getMaxRequirement() {
     
         @Override
         protected Traverser.Admin<S> processNextStart() {
    +        if (null != this.barrier) {
    +            this.barrierIterator = this.barrier.entrySet().iterator();
    +            this.barrier = null;
    +        }
    +        while (this.barrierIterator != null && 
this.barrierIterator.hasNext()) {
    +            if (null == this.barrierIterator)
    --- End diff --
    
    I didn't run it. Just thought we can get rid of the multiple `null` checks.


> OLAP dedup over non elements
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1585
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1585
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: hadoop, process
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.3
>            Reporter: Daniel Kuppitz
>            Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
>
> OLAP {{dedup()}} is highly inefficient when it's fed with non elements.
> In a customer project a query similar tho the following returned a result in 
> slightly more than 6 seconds:
> {noformat}
> persistedRDD.
>   V().hasLabel("label1","label2").
>   inE("edgeLabel1","edgeLabel2").outV().
>   id().count()
> {noformat}
> The same query with {{dedup()}} added:
> {noformat}
> persistedRDD.
>   V().hasLabel("label1","label2").
>   inE("edgeLabel1","edgeLabel2").outV().
>   id().dedup().count()
> {noformat}
> ...took more than 120 seconds.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to