Github user spmallette commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/531#discussion_r95640133
--- Diff: docs/src/recipes/appendix.asciidoc ---
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+////
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+(the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+ http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+limitations under the License.
+////
+Appendix
+========
+
+Many of the recipes are based on questions and answers provided on the
gremlin-users mailing list. This section
--- End diff --
I debated on whether to do that or not with recipes in general but given
that I usually adapt the traversals to a narrative, alter the data or improve
upon them from a performance perspective or usability perspective linking back
doesn't always make sense, so rather than do it some of the times, I opted to
not do it at all. The "appendix" might be different though....I don't recall if
I made any modifications to those or just "copied" them writing my own
explanation for what they were doing as a "title". Maybe adding the links for
those would be useful in some way....let me think on that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
