If i remember correctly Marko had wanted to have the two instances configured with the idea that we would test gremlin-python against both. I think that remains a work in progress. David Brown has some changes coming in a PR to tp32 that make some improvements to the tests over there. Perhaps we can look at getting security hooked up appropriately after that so that we can get some tests rolling there.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:16 PM, vtslab <[email protected]> wrote: > > While trying to get gremlin-python to work with the proposed Kerberos > authenticator for gremlin-server (https://github.com/apache/tin > kerpop/pull/534), I noticed that gremlin-python's pom.xml starts a > gremlin-server with SimpleAuthenticator (port 45941) but no tests seem to > use it, nor are the user= and password= arguments of the > driver_remote_connection.py ever tested. Is this still work in progress or > do I miss something? > > Possibly related to this, @davebshow remarks about the recenntly > closed/merged issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1600 > , that all gremlin-python remote_driver_connection tests pass. Does this > include username/password authentication for which the netty handler coding > possibly changed due to TINKERPOP-1600? > > Cheers, Marc >
